Sheikh v. Mughal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheikh v. Mughal

95 So. 3d 469, 2012 WL 3627505, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 24, 2012

DocketNo. 5D12-1140

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 3d 469 (Sheikh v. Mughal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheikh v. Mughal, 95 So. 3d 469, 2012 WL 3627505, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jamil Sheikh appeals from an order of civil contempt, making numerous arguments based upon matters not included in the record. Without a record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that a trial court’s order is presumed correct and that where appellant does not provide a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court has no basis to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence). See also Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jamil Sheikh appeals from an order of civil contempt, making numerous arguments based upon matters not included in the record. Without a record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (holding that a trial court’s order is presumed correct and that where appellant does not provide a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court has no basis to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence). See also Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 3d 469, 2012 WL 3627505, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheikh-v-mughal-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack