Shehee v. Kelly
This text of 15 F. App'x 405 (Shehee v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Gregory Shehee, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs for failure to retain him in the Enhanced Outpatient Program. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and affirm.
Upon our review of the record, we conclude that Shehee demonstrated, at most, that he had a difference of opinion with prison officials concerning the appropriate treatment for his mental health problems. Accordingly, the district court did not err by granting summary judgment for defendants. See Jackson v. McIntosh, 90 F.3d 330, 332 (9th Cir.1996).
We reject Shehee’s remaining contentions.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F. App'x 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shehee-v-kelly-ca9-2001.