Shehata v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shehata v. State

659 So. 2d 1106, 1995 WL 296791

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 1995

DocketNo. 94-00330

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 659 So. 2d 1106 (Shehata v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shehata v. State, 659 So. 2d 1106, 1995 WL 296791 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence without prejudice to the appellant to raise ineffective assistance of counsel in a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Gregory v. State, 588 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

We remand to the trial court to correct the judgment and sentence to reflect conviction of a third-degree felony.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s judgment and sentence without prejudice to the appellant to raise ineffective assistance of counsel in a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Gregory v. State, 588 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

We remand to the trial court to correct the judgment and sentence to reflect conviction of a third-degree felony.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 So. 2d 1106, 1995 WL 296791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shehata-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack