Shefman v. KUTHY
714 N.W.2d 317, 475 Mich. 868
This text of 714 N.W.2d 317 (Shefman v. KUTHY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shefman v. KUTHY, 714 N.W.2d 317, 475 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Peter SHEFMAN, individually, and as assignee of Terrace Land Development Group, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas E. KUTHY and Douglas E. Kuthy, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to adjourn is also considered, and it is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
714 N.W.2d 317, 475 Mich. 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shefman-v-kuthy-mich-2006.