Shefman v. KUTHY

Michigan Supreme Court

Shefman v. KUTHY

714 N.W.2d 317, 475 Mich. 868

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 30, 2006·No. 130296·Published

Opinion

714 N.W.2d 317 (2006) 475 Mich. 868

Peter SHEFMAN, individually, and as assignee of Terrace Land Development Group, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas E. KUTHY and Douglas E. Kuthy, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 130296 & (63). COA No. 255889.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to adjourn is also considered, and it is DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

714 N.W.2d 317 (2006) 475 Mich. 868

Peter SHEFMAN, individually, and as assignee of Terrace Land Development Group, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas E. KUTHY and Douglas E. Kuthy, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 130296 & (63). COA No. 255889.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 30, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to adjourn is also considered, and it is DENIED as moot.

Shefman v. KUTHY, 714 N.W.2d 317, 475 Mich. 868 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

714 N.W.2d 317 (Shefman v. KUTHY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Peter SHEFMAN, individually, and as assignee of Terrace Land Development Group, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas E. KUTHY and Douglas E. Kuthy, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.

Peter SHEFMAN, individually, and as assignee of Terrace Land Development Group, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas E. KUTHY and Douglas E. Kuthy, P.C., Defendants-Appellees.