Sheffield v. Yager

256 A.D. 748, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4836
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 5, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 748 (Sheffield v. Yager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheffield v. Yager, 256 A.D. 748, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The charge of the court that the infant plaintiff is not held to such a high degree of care as an adult or a person of mature years ” was inadequate as a statement of the principles of law applicable to a child eight years of age, for the court failed to charge the degree of care to be required. The court should, in' substance, have charged at the request of the plaintiffs’ attorney [749]*749that the duty of the infant plaintiff was to exercise a degree of care commensurate with her age and capacity.

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., concurs in result; Cohn, J., dissents.

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Naeris v. New York Telephone Co.
6 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 748, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-yager-nyappdiv-1939.