Sheffield v. Yager

256 A.D. 748, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4836
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The charge of the court that the infant plaintiff is not held to such a high degree of care as an adult or a person of mature years ” was inadequate as a statement of the principles of law applicable to a child eight years of age, for the court failed to charge the degree of care to be required. The court should, in' substance, have charged at the request of the plaintiffs’ attorney [749] that the duty of the infant plaintiff was to exercise a degree of care commensurate with her age and capacity.

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Callahan, J., concurs in result; Cohn, J., dissents.

Judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheffield v. Yager, 256 A.D. 748, 11 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

256 A.D. 748 (Sheffield v. Yager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naeris v. New York Telephone Co.
6 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)