Sheffield v. State

678 S.W.2d 82, 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided July 18, 1984·No. No. 289-84·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that appellant’s conviction should be reversed. Ex parte Crisp, 661 S.W.2d 944 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review will be refused. As is true in every case, refusal of discretionary review by this Court does not constitute an endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals in its opinion. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheffield v. State, 678 S.W.2d 82, 1984 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713 (Tex. 1984).

678 S.W.2d 82 (Sheffield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oldham v. State
977 S.W.2d 569 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Reese v. State
909 S.W.2d 929 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)