Sheffield v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Sheffield v. State

196 S.W. 1198, 81 Tex. Crim. 539, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 27, 1917

DocketNo. 4554.

StatusPublished

This text of 196 S.W. 1198 (Sheffield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheffield v. State, 196 S.W. 1198, 81 Tex. Crim. 539, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Judge.

The judgment in this case condemns appellant to two years confinement in the State penitentiary for theft.

The indictment is sufficient, charging a felony. The charge is not complained of by any bill of exceptions sufficiently presenting the issues. The judgment and sentence on verdict of the jury are regular. The rulings of the trial court are not complained of in any assignment of error and the record is without statement of facts.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. '

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Judge.

The judgment in this case condemns appellant to two years confinement in the State penitentiary for theft.

The indictment is sufficient, charging a felony. The charge is not complained of by any bill of exceptions sufficiently presenting the issues. The judgment and sentence on verdict of the jury are regular. The rulings of the trial court are not complained of in any assignment of error and the record is without statement of facts.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. '

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 S.W. 1198, 81 Tex. Crim. 539, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.