Sheffield v. State

732 S.E.2d 546, 317 Ga. App. 692, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2955, 2012 WL 4354846, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 794
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 25, 2012
DocketA12A2212
StatusPublished

This text of 732 S.E.2d 546 (Sheffield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheffield v. State, 732 S.E.2d 546, 317 Ga. App. 692, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2955, 2012 WL 4354846, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 794 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Phipps, Presiding Judge.

Ronald Sheffield appeals from the denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

After pleading guilty to charges of aggravated battery, theft by taking, and violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, Sheffield was sentenced on August 11, 2011. On September 12, 2011, Sheffield filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The trial court denied the motion, determining that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion because it was not timely filed.

Pro se on appeal, Sheffield maintains that he should be entitled to withdraw his guilty plea. “However, it is well settled that a trial court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion to withdraw a guilty plea filed after the term of court in which the defendant was sentenced under the plea.”1 Sheffield pled guilty and was sentenced in Cobb County Superior Court during the Cobb Judicial Circuit’s July 2011 term of court.2 3A new term of court began on the second Monday in September 2011.® Consequently, Sheffield filed his September 12, 2011 motion outside the term of court in which he was sentenced. “Accordingly, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to entertain [Sheffield’s] motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and therefore, did not err in denying it.”4

Sheffield may seek recourse through habeas corpus proceedings.5 But “[b]ecause [Sheffield’s] motion to withdraw the plea was [693]*693brought against the State in the county of conviction, rather than against the warden in the county in which he is incarcerated, it cannot be treated as a habeas corpus petition.”6

Decided September 25, 2012. Ronald Sheffield, pro se. Patrick H. Head, District Attorney, John R. Edwards, Benjamin M. First, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, C. J., and Dillard, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rubiani v. State
612 S.E.2d 798 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2005)
Williams v. State
689 S.E.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
Smith v. State
659 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)
Maples v. State
666 S.E.2d 609 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Henry v. State
507 S.E.2d 419 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Hall v. State
722 S.E.2d 392 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 S.E.2d 546, 317 Ga. App. 692, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2955, 2012 WL 4354846, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-state-gactapp-2012.