Sheffield v. State

769 So. 2d 493, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13499, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2483
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2000·No. No. 4D99-2221·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for possession of cocaine, possession of a concealed weapon, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting arrest with violence.

Prior to trial, appellant filed a handwritten motion to discharge the assistant public defender who was representing him. However, he never called the motion to the court’s attention. He never asked for a hearing on the motion. He proceeded to trial with the same public defender, without voicing any objection to the trial court. Under these circumstances, appellant waived his right to have the trial court conduct a hearing under Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256, 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). See Kinzie v. State, 696 So.2d 530, 530-31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

On the remaining issues raised, we find no error. See Dorelus v. State, 747 So.2d 368 (Fla.1999); Ensor v. State, 403 So.2d 349, 353 (Fla.1981), clarified in Dorelus, 747 So.2d at 371-73; Gordon v. State, 639 So.2d 188 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheffield v. State, 769 So. 2d 493, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13499, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2483 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

769 So. 2d 493 (Sheffield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

KORY SOLTIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
270 So. 3d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Thompson v. State
174 So. 3d 453 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Tomas v. State
126 So. 3d 1086 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Hall v. State
92 So. 3d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Jackson v. State
914 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)