Sheffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheffield v. State

688 So. 2d 451, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1803, 1997 WL 82554

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sheffield v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 651 So. 2d 160 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1997·No. No. 96-2509·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Yet again we have a case where, as confirmed by his signature in the record, the defendant was fully apprised of the public defender’s lien, and of his right to be heard on the matter. However, this notice was not given, as required by Rule 3.720(d)(1), at the time of sentence and so we are bound to vacate the lien without prejudice to reimpose it upon compliance with the rule.

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; LIEN VACATED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Yet again we have a case where, as confirmed by his signature in the record, the defendant was fully apprised of the public defender’s lien, and of his right to be heard on the matter. However, this notice was not given, as required by Rule 3.720(d)(1), at the time of sentence and so we are bound to vacate the lien without prejudice to reimpose it upon compliance with the rule.

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; LIEN VACATED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Sheffield v. State, 688 So. 2d 451, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1803, 1997 WL 82554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

688 So. 2d 451 (Sheffield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.