Sheffield v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sheffield v. State

688 So. 2d 451, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1803, 1997 WL 82554

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2509

StatusPublished

This text of 688 So. 2d 451 (Sheffield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheffield v. State, 688 So. 2d 451, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1803, 1997 WL 82554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Yet again we have a case where, as confirmed by his signature in the record, the defendant was fully apprised of the public defender’s lien, and of his right to be heard on the matter. However, this notice was not given, as required by Rule 3.720(d)(1), at the time of sentence and so we are bound to vacate the lien without prejudice to reimpose it upon compliance with the rule.

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; LIEN VACATED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Yet again we have a case where, as confirmed by his signature in the record, the defendant was fully apprised of the public defender’s lien, and of his right to be heard on the matter. However, this notice was not given, as required by Rule 3.720(d)(1), at the time of sentence and so we are bound to vacate the lien without prejudice to reimpose it upon compliance with the rule.

JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED; LIEN VACATED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 So. 2d 451, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1803, 1997 WL 82554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.