Sheffield v. State

128 So. 839, 99 Fla. 1098
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 839 (Sheffield v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheffield v. State, 128 So. 839, 99 Fla. 1098 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Strum and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When it' appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a judgment should be affirmed or *1099 reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 So. 839, 99 Fla. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-state-fla-1930.