Sheffield v. Sheffield
145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 685, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 394
Opinion
1. The court did not err in refusing to continue the case because of the absence of a witness who had not been subpoenaed (Civil Code (1910), § 5715) ; the evidence supports the verdict; and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
2. The request for an award of damages under the Civil Code (1910), § 6213, because it is contended that the case was taken up for delay only, is denied. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheffield v. Sheffield, 145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 685, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 394 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
145 S.E. 672 (Sheffield v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheffield v. Sheffield
173 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)