Sheffield v. Sheffield
This text of 145 S.E. 672 (Sheffield v. Sheffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in refusing to continue the case because of the absence of a witness who had not been subpoenaed (Civil Code (1910), § 5715) ; the evidence supports the verdict; and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
2. The request for an award of damages under the Civil Code (1910), § 6213, because it is contended that the case was taken up for delay only, is denied. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 685, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-sheffield-gactapp-1928.