Sheffield v. Sheffield

145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 685, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 394
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1928·No. 19133·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in refusing to continue the case because of the absence of a witness who had not been subpoenaed (Civil Code (1910), § 5715) ; the evidence supports the verdict; and the motion for a new trial was properly overruled.

2. The request for an award of damages under the Civil Code (1910), § 6213, because it is contended that the case was taken up for delay only, is denied. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh. J.. concur. IK. I. Geer, for plaintiff in error. P. B. Rich, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheffield v. Sheffield, 145 S.E. 672, 38 Ga. App. 685, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 394 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

145 S.E. 672 (Sheffield v. Sheffield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheffield v. Sheffield
173 S.E. 121 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)