Sheffield v. Roberts
This text of Sheffield v. Roberts (Sheffield v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED
UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT FEB 1 6 2012 FGR THE DISTRICT OF CGLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the District of Co|umbIa
Donnie Wayne Sheffield, ) ) Plaintiff, )
) o :~
v. ) Civil Action No. 1b L) ) John G. Roberts, Jr., et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution in Salters, South Carolina, suing the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, "at least four unknown Supreme Court Associate Justices," and a Supreme Court employee. Compl. Caption. The complaint arises from the denial of plaintiff s petition for a writ of certiorari. Compl. 1]4.
This Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the decisions of the Supreme Court. In re Marin, 956 F.Zd 339 (D.C. Cir. 1992); see Panko v. Roa’ak, 606 F.Zd 168, 171 n.6 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1081 (1980) ("It seems axiomatic that a lower court may not order
the judges or officers of a higher court to take an action."). A separate Order of dismissal
accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. s
Unifed St:ltes District Judge Date: February , 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sheffield v. Roberts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-roberts-dcd-2012.