Sheffield v. King

103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 316, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 766
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 11, 1920
Docket11358
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 198 (Sheffield v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheffield v. King, 103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 316, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 766 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment denying the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 198, 25 Ga. App. 316, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-king-gactapp-1920.