Sheffield v. Key

14 Ga. 537
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1854
DocketNo. 68
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 Ga. 537 (Sheffield v. Key) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheffield v. Key, 14 Ga. 537 (Ga. 1854).

Opinion

By the court.

Benning J.,

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The declaration does not vary from the affidavit. “ At Law, the legal right and liability entirely survive against and for the surviving partners, who alone can, at Law, sue and be sued. (Golding vs. J. & G. Vaughan, 2 Chitty R. 436.)— Therefore, “ A demand against a surviving partner, as survivor, may be joined with a demand due from him, as if he were solely liable.” (lbid.)

And for the same reason, a debt due to a defendant as surviving partner, may be set off against a debt due from him in his own separate character. (Slipper & others vs. Stidstone 5 Durn. & E. 493. French vs. Andrade, 6 Do. 582. 1 Chitty Pl. 37.

As the declaration does not vary from the affidavit, it is not worth while to enquire whether if it did, the fact of its doing so, is such a matter as the claimant, a stranger to the case, could use for any purpose.

The case ought, therefore, to be re-instated and tried again.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Busby & Son v. Elliott
95 S.E. 1014 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ga. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-key-ga-1854.