Sheffield v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
This text of 231 P.3d 165 (Sheffield v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Melissa SHEFFIELD, Respondent,
v.
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. and Randy Reich, Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its March 30, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. Respondent's answer and cross-petition for review is also denied. The Respondent's request for attorney fees is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent should file *166 an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 P.3d 165, 168 Wash. 2d 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-v-goodyear-tire-rubber-co-wash-2010.