Sheffield v. Dean

135 S.E. 109, 36 Ga. App. 56, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 759
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1926·No. 17145·Published

Opinion

Bell, J.

1. Where a bill of sale to secure a debt described the property as “30 head of horses now located at the residence of said B. S. Jones [the maker], in the 12th district of Miller county, Georgia,” the description was so vague and indefinite that the record of the instrument was, as a matter of law, insufficient to give constructive notice to a purchaser of a part of the property from one other than the maker. Nussbaum v. Waterman, 9 Ga. App. 56 (3) (70 S. E. 259); Reynolds v. Tifton Guano Co., 20 Ga. App. 49 (1) (92 S. E. 389); Ellis v. Lynch, 28 Ga. App. 529 (112 S. E. 151); Hicks v. Walker Brothers Co., 31 Ga. App. 395 (2) (120 S. E. 694); Nix v. Citizens Bank, 34 Ga. App. 546 (2) (130 S. E. 597).

2. T'he above ruling controls all the special grounds of the motion for new trial, adversely to the plaintiff in error. The evidence authorized the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheffield v. Dean, 135 S.E. 109, 36 Ga. App. 56, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 759 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

135 S.E. 109 (Sheffield v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nussbaum v. Waterman & Co.
70 S.E. 259 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Reynolds v. Tifton Guano Co.
92 S.E. 389 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Ellis v. Lynch
112 S.E. 151 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Hicks v. Walker Bros.
120 S.E. 694 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Nix v. Citizens Bank
130 S.E. 597 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)