Sheffield, Et Ux. v. Lloyd, Etc.

10 So. 2d 806, 151 Fla. 454, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1196
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 So. 2d 806 (Sheffield, Et Ux. v. Lloyd, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheffield, Et Ux. v. Lloyd, Etc., 10 So. 2d 806, 151 Fla. 454, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1196 (Fla. 1942).

Opinion

*455 PER CURIAM:

On writ of error we review judgment in favor of plaintiff in an ejectment action on directed verdict.

The plaintiffs proved a paramount title to the property involved.

No useful purpose may be served, or valuable result be accomplished, by promulgating an opinion discussing the questions presented in the briefs filed.

It is sufficient to say that the record has been examined in the light of the briefs on behalf of the respective parties and no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Light v. Meginniss
22 So. 2d 455 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 So. 2d 806, 151 Fla. 454, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheffield-et-ux-v-lloyd-etc-fla-1942.