Sheffield, Et Ux. v. Lloyd, Etc.

10 So. 2d 806, 151 Fla. 454, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1196
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 16, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*455 PER CURIAM:

On writ of error we review judgment in favor of plaintiff in an ejectment action on directed verdict.

The plaintiffs proved a paramount title to the property involved.

No useful purpose may be served, or valuable result be accomplished, by promulgating an opinion discussing the questions presented in the briefs filed.

It is sufficient to say that the record has been examined in the light of the briefs on behalf of the respective parties and no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheffield, Et Ux. v. Lloyd, Etc., 10 So. 2d 806, 151 Fla. 454, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1196 (Fla. 1942).

10 So. 2d 806 (Sheffield, Et Ux. v. Lloyd, Etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Light v. Meginniss
22 So. 2d 455 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)