Sheets v. Sunbury & Northumberland Electric Railway Co.

85 A. 92, 237 Pa. 153, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 907
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 2, 1912·No. Appeal, No. 247·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned judge of the Common Pleas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheets v. Sunbury & Northumberland Electric Railway Co., 85 A. 92, 237 Pa. 153, 1912 Pa. LEXIS 907 (Pa. 1912).

85 A. 92 (Sheets v. Sunbury & Northumberland Electric Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teal v. King Farms Co.
181 F. Supp. 235 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1960)
Kotal v. Goldberg
100 A.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Miller v. Hickey
81 A.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.
188 A. 190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Bechtel v. Franklin Trust Co.
182 A. 800 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Lentz v. Allentown Bobbin Works
140 A. 541 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Kehres v. Stuempfle
136 A. 794 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Kelly v. Northampton County Agricultural Society
132 A. 832 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Thorndike v. Buena Vista Springs Hotel Co.
7 Pa. D. & C. 403 (Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Mardo v. Valley Smokeless Coal Co.
123 A. 779 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Mardo v. Valley Smokeless Coal Co.
3 Pa. D. & C. 94 (Cambria County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Kuntz v. Waldameer Co.
68 Pa. Super. 73 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Sellmer v. Ringling
62 Pa. Super. 410 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)