Sheets v. Presseller

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided September 16, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-00495·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

ANDREW BRYANT SHEETS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:24-cv-495-JLB-KCD

JERRY PRESSELLER, THE DOWNTOWN MERCHANTS COMMITTEE OF PUNTA GORDA, INC., DAVID JOSEPH LIPKER and CITY OF PUNTA GORDA,

Defendants. / ORDER Plaintiff Andrew Sheets previously moved a clerk’s default against Defendant The Downtown Merchants Committee of Punta Gorda, Inc. (Doc. 41.) That request was denied (Doc. 43), and Plaintiff now asks the Court to reconsider its ruling (Doc. 46). Defendant Jerry Presseller has responded in opposition to the motion for reconsideration. (Doc. 47.) Plaintiff’s motion will be denied because he merely seeks to re-litigate the merits of his request for a clerk’s default. But “a motion for reconsideration does not provide an opportunity to simply reargue an issue the Court has once determined.” Am. Ass’n of People With Disabilities v. Hood, 278 F. Supp. 2d 1337, 1340 (M.D. Fla. 2003). Reconsideration of a previous order is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly. “Only a change in the law, or the facts upon which a decision is based, will justify a reconsideration of a previous order.” Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A., 153 F.R.D. 689, 694 (M.D. Fla. 1994). Plaintiff does not claim an intervening change in controlling law or the underlying facts. Nor has he shown any legal error to induce the Court to

reverse its decision. While Plaintiff claims he contacted Defendant, who stated they received service, and he contacted the Sheriffs Office, who says service

was proper, these facts don’t change the outcome. As outlined in the Court’s order denying default, service on Diane Ford as “office manager” does not follow Florida law. (Doc. 43 at 2-3.) As ordered, Plaintiff must attempt service in compliance with Fla. Stat. § 48.081 by October 7, 2024. Ud. at 3-4.) Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 46) is DENIED. ENTERED in Fort Myers, Florida on September 16, 2024.

Ly le é lt ale * Kale C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheets v. Presseller, (M.D. Fla. 2024).

Sheets v. Presseller (Sheets v. Presseller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Ass'n of People With Disabilities v. Hood
278 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Florida, 2003)
Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.
153 F.R.D. 689 (M.D. Florida, 1994)