Sheets v. Associates Discount Corp.
134 S.E.2d 885, 108 Ga. App. 856, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 1040
Opinion
The only assignments of error in the present case deal with the correctness of a judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s general demurrer to the defendant’s answer and striking the same. “This order is not such a final judgment as can be reviewed by a direct bill of exceptions. Code Ann. § 6-701. Henderson v. Howard, 149 Ga. 63 (99 SE 27).” Shaw v. Miller, 214 Ga. 225 (104 SE2d 128). Accordingly, there being no exception to a final judgment, the writ of error must be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheets v. Associates Discount Corp., 134 S.E.2d 885, 108 Ga. App. 856, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 1040 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).
134 S.E.2d 885 (Sheets v. Associates Discount Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaw v. Miller
104 S.E.2d 128 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Henderson v. Howard
99 S.E. 27 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)