Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 268 v. Enskat Mechanical, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedSeptember 1, 2022
Docket3:22-cv-01148
StatusUnknown

This text of Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 268 v. Enskat Mechanical, LLC (Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 268 v. Enskat Mechanical, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 268 v. Enskat Mechanical, LLC, (S.D. Ill. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SHEET METAL WORKERS ) INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ) LOCAL268, ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 22-cv-1148-DWD ) ENSKAT MECHANICAL, LLC, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DUGAN, District Judge:

On July 26, 2022, a Notice of Impending Dismissal for Want of Prosecution was entered directing Plaintiffs, Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 268, Sheet Metal Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers International Association Local 268 Amended Pension Trust, Jeff Bauer, Jon Lepere, Jonathan Mentz, Brian Langhauser, Brad McPherson, Phil Halliday, Sheet Metal Workers Association Local 268 Welfare Plan, Sheet Metal Workers Local Union No. 268 Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee, Greg Reynolds, Walter House, and Local 268 of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers Vacation Trust, to request an entry of default against Defendant Enskat Mechanical, LLC by August 16, 2022 (Doc. 13). The Notice advised Plaintiffs that a failure to make a request for default pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure would result in the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ case for want of prosecution (Doc. 13). To date, the Court has received no further correspondence concerning this matter. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss this matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); James v.

McDonald's Corp., 417 F.3d 672, 681 (7th Cir. 2005) (under Rule 41(b) a court has authority to dismiss an action with prejudice for failure to prosecute if a party does not provide a timely response to a court order). This action is therefore DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2022 /s/ David W. Dugan DAVID W. DUGAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 268 v. Enskat Mechanical, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheet-metal-workers-international-association-local-268-v-enskat-ilsd-2022.