Sheen v. Smith Barney, Inc.
721 So. 2d 823, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15879, 1998 WL 890173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1998·No. No. 97-3438·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the final summary judgment entered on Appellant’s counterclaim. We have not, however, considered the order finding Appellee is entitled to attorney’s fees, as that issue is not ripe for review. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheen v. Smith Barney, Inc., 721 So. 2d 823, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15879, 1998 WL 890173 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
721 So. 2d 823 (Sheen v. Smith Barney, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bitz v. ED KNOX CLU & ASSOCIATES
721 So. 2d 823 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)