Sheeler v. Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union

57 Pa. D. & C. 595, 1945 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 161
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
DecidedOctober 8, 1945
Docketno. 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 57 Pa. D. & C. 595 (Sheeler v. Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheeler v. Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union, 57 Pa. D. & C. 595, 1945 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 161 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1945).

Opinion

Smith, P. J.,

This matter comes before the court upon a bill in equity filed by three employes of Crotty Bros., operator of a cafeteria at the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation, Johnsville, Pa., on their own behalf and on behalf of persons similarly situated, praying for an accounting and judgment therefor against Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union, Philadelphia Joint Council, United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees, and other respondents, individually and as officers of said unincorporated associations, arising from the payment of certain monthly dues and initiation fees deducted by said Crotty Bros, from the wages of complainants, and paid by said Crotty Bros, to respondent, Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union.

Findings of fact

1. Each of complainants, during the Fall of 1942, and sometime thereafter, were employes of Crotty Bros., a Pennsylvania corporation which owned and operated a cafeteria at the plant of Brewster Aeronautical Corporation, Johnsville, Pa.

[596]*5962. Many of complainants are presently employed at said cafeteria by the Easton Operating Corporation, successors of Crotty Bros.

3. During September 1942 one Bernard Rifkin, the educational director of the United Automobile Workers Union, C. I. 0., of which many of the employes of the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation were members, was approached by the cafeteria employes of the Brewster plant, all of whom desired to become affiliated with said union with a view to obtaining increased wages and the benefits of a union of international scope and influence; and, accordingly, nearly all of said cafeteria employes signed cards indicating their willingness to join said United Automobile Workers Union, C. I. 0.

4. Subsequent to the execution of the aforementioned cards the executive board of the United Automobile Workers Union, C. I. 0., advised Bernard Rifkin to turn said cards over to the United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America, C. I. 0. (hereinafter referred to as international union), as that union could better represent said cafeteria employes.

5. Said Bernard Rifkin telephoned one of the respondents, Albert Brown, and informed him that there were approximately 80 employes of the cafeteria at the Brewster plant who desired to join the union, said Albert Brown at that time being a member of Local No. 114, Shoe Salesmens Union, and business agent of Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union.

6. Bernard Rifkin, during the aforementioned telephone conversation, asked Albert Brown whether Local No. 107 was affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, and Albert Brown answered in the affirmative.

[597]*5977. Bernard Rifkin, during October 1942, introduced Albert Brown to the cafeteria employes at the Brewster plant at a meeting or meetings, during which said employes signed cards evidencing their intention to join the United Food Workers Industrial Union, Local No. 107, said cards having printed thereon: “Affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations”, and directing a check-off of union dues and initiation fees by their employer, Crotty Bros.

8. At the meeting in October 1942 Albert Brown spoke to the employes of Crotty Bros, about the international union, its large membership, its influence, and the death benefits available to its members, and further informed them that they would not be required to pay dues until such time as they secured an increase in wages.

9. As a result of the representations made by Albert Brown, the employes of Crotty Bros, signed the aforementioned cards for the purpose of becoming affiliated with said Local No. 107, which they believed to be a member of the international union.

10. That said employes did receive an increase in wages, and thereafter, from November 1942 through October 1943, a period of 11 months, Crotty Bros., in accordance with the directions of each of said employes, deducted from their salaries the initiation fees and various monthly union dues, and paid the same to said Local No. 107, which, in turn, deposited said funds in its bank account.

11. Local No. 107, of which Albert Brown claimed to be business agent, was an affiliate of the international union prior to March 7, 1939.

12. On or about March 7, 1939, the charter of said Local No. 107 was suspended by the international union; during the Spring of 1940 Joseph Konowe, international representative of said international union, took possession of said charter and delivered it to the [598]*598international office; and since that date said international union has taken no action whatsoever to reinstate said charter.

13. Said Local No. 107 at the time complainants (employes of Crotty Bros, at said Brewster plant) became associated with it, was not a member of or affiliated with said international union, and said complainants, therefore, were not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, or benefits accorded to members of a bona fide local of the Congress of Industrial Organizations.

14. The aforementioned representations made by Albert Brown, as business agent of Local No. 107, to complainants, at the time they were made, were known by him to be false and untrue.

15. Said Local No. 107 never made any payments from the funds received by it from complainants to said international union.

16. Respondents, Norman Lipschutz, as president, and Vito Mastranado, as secretary, of Local 107, had full knowledge of the false representations of their business agent, Albert Brown, and actively participated in the fraúd and deceit upon complainants.

17. Said Local No. 107 deposited with respondent, Philadelphia Joint Council, United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees (hereinafter referred to as joint council), certain of the dues and initiation fees received from complainants as a result of deductions made from their wages by their employer, Crotty Bros.; the officers of said joint council being five of respondents, namely, Harold Cantor, president; B. B. Smith, vice president; Harry Sirken, treasurer; Helen Turner, secretary, and Albert Brown, business agent.

18. Said joint council and its officers aforesaid had full knowledge at the time they received the moneys [599]*599of complainants that said Local No. 107 was not affiliated with the United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America, C. I. 0.

19. In receiving said moneys of complainants, the joint council and its officers knew that none of complainants as a result of paying dues to Local No. 107 would be entitled to the rights, benefits, and privileges accorded to members of a bona fide local of said international union.

20. Said joint council, during January 1944, was suspended by said international union for harboring within its organization, with the consent and knowledge of its officers, the nonexistent Local No. 107.

Conclusions of law

1. Albert Brown, individually and as agent for Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union, was guilty of a wilful misrepresentation when he informed the employes of Crotty Bros., at the Brewster Aeronautical Corporation, Johnsville, Pa., that said Local No. 107 was affiliated with the United Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Employees of America, C. I. O.

2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Pa. D. & C. 595, 1945 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheeler-v-local-no-107-united-food-workers-industrial-union-pactcomplphilad-1945.