Sheeler v. Blade Contracting, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sheeler v. Blade Contracting, Inc.

269 A.D.2d 522, 704 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1981

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 269 A.D.2d 522 (Sheeler v. Blade Contracting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheeler v. Blade Contracting, Inc., 269 A.D.2d 522, 704 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), entered March 10, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court (Jacobson, J.) dated August 28, 1998, granting the plaintiff judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $200,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded to the plaintiff did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances of this case (see, CPLR 5501).

The.defendants’ remaining contention is without merit (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133; Teneriello v Travelers Cos., 264 AD2d 772). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), entered March 10, 1999, which, upon an order of the same court (Jacobson, J.) dated August 28, 1998, granting the plaintiff judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sum of $200,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The damages awarded to the plaintiff did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances of this case (see, CPLR 5501).

The.defendants’ remaining contention is without merit (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133; Teneriello v Travelers Cos., 264 AD2d 772). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 522, 704 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheeler-v-blade-contracting-inc-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack