Sheehy v. Holmes
55 Cal. 485, 1880 Cal. LEXIS 307
Opinion
In this cause no answer has been filed by the respondent, nor was there any appearance on his behalf at the hearing. We have examined the case, and think the petitioner entitled to the writ prayed for.
Let the peremptory writ issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheehy v. Holmes, 55 Cal. 485, 1880 Cal. LEXIS 307 (Cal. 1880).
55 Cal. 485 (Sheehy v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Pacific Railroad v. Superior Court
63 Cal. 607 (California Supreme Court, 1883)