Sheehy v. Cole

255 A.D. 814, 7 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5418

This text of 255 A.D. 814 (Sheehy v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheehy v. Cole, 255 A.D. 814, 7 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

In an action for the partition of real property, order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint because of failure to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead over within twenty days of the entry of the order hereon. The complaint does not show the plaintiff’s right to bring the action, nor does it allege the relationships, if any, between the decedent and the several parties. If the decedent died intestate that should be alleged. (Doane v. Mercantile Trust Co., 160 N. Y. 494.) The conclusions of law alleged are not sufficient to establish the right to maintain the action. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doane v. . Mercantile Trust Co.
55 N.E. 296 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D. 814, 7 N.Y.S.2d 264, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheehy-v-cole-nyappdiv-1938.