Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Sheehan v. Steers

Sheehan v. Steers

184 A.D.2d 705
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 1992·Published

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the Law Guardian appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), dated November 7, 1990, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[706] We discern no basis for disturbing the Family Court’s determination, after a hearing, that the petitioners did not sustain their burden in proving that the best interests of the child would be served by granting their petition for custody (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Matter of Michael B., 180 AD2d 792; Matter of Hollington v Cocchiola, 180 AD2d 635; Matter of Dinino v Deima, 173 AD2d 1017, 1018; Reiss v Reiss, 170 AD2d 589). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheehan v. Steers, 184 A.D.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

184 A.D.2d 705 (Sheehan v. Steers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eschbach v. Eschbach
436 N.E.2d 1260 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Reiss v. Reiss
170 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Dinino v. Deima
173 A.D.2d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Hollington v. Cocchiola
180 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Michael B.
180 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)