Sheehan v. Richardson

First Circuit

Sheehan v. Richardson

185 F. App'x 11

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 23, 2006·No. No. 04-2505·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the parties’ arguments in their briefs and during oral argument, we are satisfied that the district court correctly analyzed the case in its published memorandum and order. Sheehan v. Richardson, 315 B.R. 226 (D.R.I.2004). On appeal, we find no arguments requiring our further elucidation. We therefore affirm the entry of summary judgment for the appellee substantially for the reasons set out in the district court’s memorandum and order.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the parties’ arguments in their briefs and during oral argument, we are satisfied that the district court correctly analyzed the case in its published memorandum and order. Sheehan v. Richardson, 315 B.R. 226 (D.R.I.2004). On appeal, we find no arguments requiring our further elucidation. We therefore affirm the entry of summary judgment for the appellee substantially for the reasons set out in the district court’s memorandum and order.

So ordered.

Sheehan v. Richardson, 185 F. App'x 11 (1st Cir. 2006).

Pincite

185 F. App'x 11 (Sheehan v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related