Sheehan v. Lee

126 A. 924, 98 N.J.L. 901, 13 Gummere 901, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sheehan v. Lee. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 N.J.L. 341
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 20, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heepenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheehan v. Lee, 126 A. 924, 98 N.J.L. 901, 13 Gummere 901, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 307 (N.J. 1923).

126 A. 924 (Sheehan v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.