Sheehan v. Fredericks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Sheehan v. Fredericks

202 N.W.2d 881, 295 Minn. 527, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1143

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 22, 1972·No. No. 43542·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial following a judgment of the district court dismissing her action to vacate a divorce decree entered February 28, 1963, on the grounds of fraud.

We have considered the assignments of error made by plaintiff and hold that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment of the trial court are adequately sustained by the record and proceedings herein and that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial following a judgment of the district court dismissing her action to vacate a divorce decree entered February 28, 1963, on the grounds of fraud.

We have considered the assignments of error made by plaintiff and hold that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment of the trial court are adequately sustained by the record and proceedings herein and that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Affirmed.

Sheehan v. Fredericks, 202 N.W.2d 881, 295 Minn. 527, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1143 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

202 N.W.2d 881 (Sheehan v. Fredericks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.