Sheehan v. Fredericks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Sheehan v. Fredericks

202 N.W.2d 881, 295 Minn. 527, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1143

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedDecember 22, 1972

DocketNo. 43542

StatusPublished

This text of 202 N.W.2d 881 (Sheehan v. Fredericks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheehan v. Fredericks, 202 N.W.2d 881, 295 Minn. 527, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1143 (Mich. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial following a judgment of the district court dismissing her action to vacate a divorce decree entered February 28, 1963, on the grounds of fraud.

We have considered the assignments of error made by plaintiff and hold that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment of the trial court are adequately sustained by the record and proceedings herein and that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for a new trial following a judgment of the district court dismissing her action to vacate a divorce decree entered February 28, 1963, on the grounds of fraud.

We have considered the assignments of error made by plaintiff and hold that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment of the trial court are adequately sustained by the record and proceedings herein and that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 N.W.2d 881, 295 Minn. 527, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheehan-v-fredericks-minn-1972.