Sheehan v. Dowling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Sheehan v. Dowling

56 N.W. 896, 55 Minn. 289, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 199

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 17, 1893

DocketNo. 8339

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.W. 896 (Sheehan v. Dowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheehan v. Dowling, 56 N.W. 896, 55 Minn. 289, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 199 (Mich. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Bcox, J.

We have examined with care the quite lengthy record in this case, and we think that the court below was fully justified upon the evidence in granting a new trial. And we do not feel disposed tp depart from the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 434, (Gil. 398,) that great weight will be given by this court to the opinion of the judge who presided on the trial in the court below. Manifestly there was no abuse of discretion of the trial judge, and his order granting a new trial is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bcox, J.

We have examined with care the quite lengthy record in this case, and we think that the court below was fully justified upon the evidence in granting a new trial. And we do not feel disposed tp depart from the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 434, (Gil. 398,) that great weight will be given by this court to the opinion of the judge who presided on the trial in the court below. Manifestly there was no abuse of discretion of the trial judge, and his order granting a new trial is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.W. 896, 55 Minn. 289, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheehan-v-dowling-minn-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack