Sheehan v. Dir. Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sheehan v. Dir. Revenue

545 S.W.3d 930

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2018

DocketWD 80603

StatusPublished

This text of 545 S.W.3d 930 (Sheehan v. Dir. Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sheehan v. Dir. Revenue, 545 S.W.3d 930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Ms. Tessa Sheehan appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, sustaining the Director of Revenue's revocation of her Missouri *931driver's license based on her refusal to submit to a chemical test, pursuant to section 577.041, RSMo. Ms. Sheehan argues that the trial court erred in finding that there was sufficient evidence from which the arresting officer could have had probable cause to believe that she was driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Ms. Tessa Sheehan appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, sustaining the Director of Revenue's revocation of her Missouri *931driver's license based on her refusal to submit to a chemical test, pursuant to section 577.041, RSMo. Ms. Sheehan argues that the trial court erred in finding that there was sufficient evidence from which the arresting officer could have had probable cause to believe that she was driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

545 S.W.3d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheehan-v-dir-revenue-moctapp-2018.