Sheehan v. City of San Francisco

793 F.3d 1009, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12096, 2015 WL 4241392
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2015·No. No. 11-16401·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

In our previous opinion, Sheehan v. City & County of San Francisco, 743 F.3d 1211 (9th Cir.2014), we affirmed in part and vacated in part the judgment of the district court. In City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 1765, 191 L.Ed.2d 856 (2015), the Supreme Court reversed our judgment in part and remanded to this court for further proceedings. Under these decisions, the district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants on Shee-han’s Fourth Amendment claims but, as explained in Parts III and IV of our previous opinion, erred by granting- summary judgment to the defendants on Sheehan’s Americans with Disabilities Act and state law claims. We therefore affirm in part and vacate in part the judgment of the district court and remand to the district court for further proceedings. Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheehan v. City of San Francisco, 793 F.3d 1009, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12096, 2015 WL 4241392 (9th Cir. 2015).

793 F.3d 1009 (Sheehan v. City of San Francisco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bresaz v. County of Santa Clara
136 F. Supp. 3d 1125 (N.D. California, 2015)