Sheehan v. Balasic
710 A.2d 770, 245 Conn. 148, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 210
Opinion
Opinion
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1
The appeal is dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheehan v. Balasic, 710 A.2d 770, 245 Conn. 148, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 210 (Colo. 1998).
710 A.2d 770 (Sheehan v. Balasic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Neill v. O'Neill
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2021
Oudheusden v. Oudheusden
338 Conn. 761 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)
Robaczynski v. Robaczynski
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014
Pite v. Pite
43 A.3d 229 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
Sosin v. Sosin
14 A.3d 307 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2011)
Sutherland v. Sutherland
944 A.2d 395 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2008)
Monette v. Monette
924 A.2d 894 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
Burke v. Burke
892 A.2d 964 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Williams v. Williams
886 A.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2005)
Weinstein v. Weinstein
867 A.2d 111 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)
Kiszka v. Kiszka, No. Fa95-0710091 (Nov. 3, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 13869 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)
Wichman v. Wichman
714 A.2d 1274 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)