Sheedee v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sheedee v. City of New York

126 A.D. 902, 110 N.Y.S. 1145

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1908·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We think that a sufficient case for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence has not been made out. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

We think that a sufficient case for a new trial upon the ground of newly-discovered evidence has not been made out. The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Sheedee v. City of New York, 126 A.D. 902, 110 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

126 A.D. 902 (Sheedee v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.