Shedrick v. State
This text of 235 So. 2d 57 (Shedrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal from a denial of defendant’s motion under Rule 1.850, Cr.P.R., 33 F.S. A., to vacate a sentence of the Criminal Court of Record for Palm Beach County, Florida, is affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Rhoden v. Chapman, 1937, 127 Fla. 9, 172 So. 56, but without prejudice to the defendant’s right to re-apply to the trial court for the relief previously sought should the United States Supreme Court hereafter hold that the resentencing standards it announced in North Carolina v. Pearce, 1969, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. [58]*582072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656, must be applied retroactively.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 So. 2d 57, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shedrick-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.