Shedrick Jermaine Thorton v. the State of Texas
This text of Shedrick Jermaine Thorton v. the State of Texas (Shedrick Jermaine Thorton v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 12, 2022
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00189-CR
SHEDRICK JERMAINE THORTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-76804-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia On March 8, 2022, Shedrick Jermaine Thorton filed his notice of appeal in
this case. Three weeks later, the State filed a motion to dismiss, contending that the
notice of appeal was untimely. After reviewing the clerk’s record, the reporter’s
record, and the State’s motion, we will grant the motion and dismiss this appeal.
In August of 2015, appellant was charged with violation of a protective order
or bond condition – assault stalking. On January 12, 2017, after appellant pleaded
guilty, the trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at ten years,
probated for ten years; the trial court’s judgment states that appellant’s probated
sentence was to “start after [his six-year] sentence in #F14-76803-H has been discharged.” On September 11, 2019, appellant filed a notice of appeal in the trial
court.1 On February 9, 2022, after he was released in trial court cause #F14-76803-
H, the trial court set the conditions of his probation in this case. Five days later, the
trial court modified the conditions of his probation to include electronic monitoring.
Appellant then filed a notice of appeal with this Court, seeking to challenge “the trial
court’s decision to enforce a 10 year probation sentence, that was ordered against
him on January 12, 2017.”
“Jurisdiction concerns the power of a court to hear and determine a case.”
Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). The jurisdiction of an
appellate court must be legally invoked; if not, the power of the court to act is as
absent as if it did not exist. See id. at 523. “The standard to determine whether an
appellate court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a case ‘is not whether the
appeal is precluded by law, but whether the appeal is authorized by law.’” Blanton
v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (quoting Abbott v. State, 271
S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008)). The right to appeal in a criminal case
is a statutorily created right. See McKinney v. State, 207 S.W.3d 366, 374 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2006); Griffin v. State, 145 S.W.3d 645, 646 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
See also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (providing right of appeal for
defendant); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (rules for appeal by defendant).
1 For reasons that are unclear, the 2019 notice of appeal was not forwarded to this Court until the clerk’s record in this appeal was filed on April 8, 2022. –2– A timely-filed notice of appeal vests the courts of appeals with jurisdiction.
Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Absent a timely filed motion for new trial, appellant’s
notice of appeal was due by February 13, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). To
obtain the benefit of the extension period provided by rule 26.3, appellant had to file
his notice of appeal in the trial court and an extension motion in this Court by
February 27, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3; Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210
(Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (per curiam); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. The notice of appeal
filed in this Court shows it was prepared and postmarked on March 4, 2022. Even if
we were to consider his September 11, 2019 notice of appeal, that notice is also
untimely. Because appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we lack jurisdiction over
the appeal. See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523.
We dismiss this appeal.
/Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA Do Not Publish JUSTICE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 220189F.U05
–3– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
SHEDRICK JERMAINE On Appeal from the Criminal District THORTON, Appellant Court No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-76804-H. No. 05-22-00189-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. Justices Molberg and Reichek THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Judgment entered April 12, 2022
–4–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shedrick Jermaine Thorton v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shedrick-jermaine-thorton-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.