Home/New York Court of Appeals/Shed v. Sofia

Shed v. Sofia

521 N.E.2d 440, 70 N.Y.2d 997, 526 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 164
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 1988·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. There is no basis upon which we can disturb the trial court’s exercise of discretion, balancing the interests of all concerned, especially the best interests of the children, or its application of the Weiss v Weiss (52 NY2d 170) extraordinary circumstances test, as affirmed by the majority at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shed v. Sofia, 521 N.E.2d 440, 70 N.Y.2d 997, 526 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 164 (N.Y. 1988).

521 N.E.2d 440 (Shed v. Sofia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald C. O. v. Carolyn D. V. B.
224 A.D.2d 930 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Ladizhensky v. Ladizhensky
184 A.D.2d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Hollington v. Cocchiola
180 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Reyes v. Ball
162 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Stec v. Levindofske
153 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Towne v. Towne
154 A.D.2d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Stechel v. Stechel
144 A.D.2d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Pecorello v. Snodgrass
142 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)