Shears v. Bingaman

911 N.W.2d 728
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 30, 2018
DocketSC: 156789; COA: 329776
StatusPublished

This text of 911 N.W.2d 728 (Shears v. Bingaman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shears v. Bingaman, 911 N.W.2d 728 (Mich. 2018).

Opinion

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Genesee Co. Drain Comm'r Jeffrey Wright v. Genesee Co. (Docket No. 156579) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

Clement, J., did not participate due to her prior involvement as chief legal counsel for the Governor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
911 N.W.2d 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shears-v-bingaman-mich-2018.