Shearod v. Forty-first & Park Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shearod v. Forty-first & Park Avenue Corp.

227 A.D. 806

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 227 A.D. 806 (Shearod v. Forty-first & Park Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shearod v. Forty-first & Park Avenue Corp., 227 A.D. 806 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. We are of opinion that plaintiff failed to show any negligence on the part of defendant. (Abbott v. Richmond County Country Club, 211 App. Div. 231; affd., 240 N. Y. 693.) The case of Worth v. Ebinger Baking Co., Inc. (225 App. Div. 765) is distinguishable from the case at bar. Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. We are of opinion that plaintiff failed to show any negligence on the part of defendant. (Abbott v. Richmond County Country Club, 211 App. Div. 231; affd., 240 N. Y. 693.) The case of Worth v. Ebinger Baking Co., Inc. (225 App. Div. 765) is distinguishable from the case at bar. Rich, Kapper, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D. 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shearod-v-forty-first-park-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack