Home/New York Court of Appeals/Shearman v. Pope

Shearman v. Pope

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 710
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shearman v. Pope. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 N.Y. 664 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1887·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The same court which required the plaintiff to give security for costs subsequently made an order allowing the plaintiff to prosecute this action as a poor person. The stay of proceedings granted when the first order was made, did not deprive the court of jurisdiction to make the second order, and that order was an answer to the motion to dismiss the complaint.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shearman v. Pope, 8 N.Y. St. Rep. 710 (N.Y. 1887).

8 N.Y. St. Rep. 710 (Shearman v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.