Shearman v. Morrison
24 A. 313, 149 Pa. 386, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1142
Opinion
A careful examination of this case fails to disclose error on the part of the learned judge below, and we affirm the decree for the reasons given by him.
The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shearman v. Morrison, 24 A. 313, 149 Pa. 386, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 1142 (Pa. 1892).
24 A. 313 (Shearman v. Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Purman v. Fitch
42 A.2d 318 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Kelter v. American Bankers Finance Co.
160 A. 127 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
England v. Winslow
237 P. 542 (California Supreme Court, 1925)
Hostetter v. Giffen
112 A. 150 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)