Shearin v. State

877 S.W.2d 165, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 1994 WL 199669
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 24, 1994·No. No. 65167·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Tanya Shearin, appeals from the dismissal of her Rule 24.035 motion. The motion court found that defendant filed her motion more than ninety days after her delivery to the department of corrections and therefore she waived her right to seek post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. See Rule 24.035(b).

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shearin v. State, 877 S.W.2d 165, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 1994 WL 199669 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

877 S.W.2d 165 (Shearin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.