Shearer v. Shearer

99 S.E. 754, 112 S.C. 126, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 104
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 23, 1919
Docket10202
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 S.E. 754 (Shearer v. Shearer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shearer v. Shearer, 99 S.E. 754, 112 S.C. 126, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 104 (S.C. 1919).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from an order granting temporary alimony and a fee for the plaintiff’s attorney. Such cases have been before the Court so often in recent years, and the principles governing them are so well established, that we do not deem it necessary to cite any authorities, other than those mentioned in the arguments of the attorneys, for the respective parties.

*127 The application herein for temporary alimony and a counsel fee was addressed to the sound discretion of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, and the appellant’s attorneys have failed to satisfy this Court that such discretion was erroneously exercised. Having reached this conclusion, we do not deem it advisable to discuss the testimony, as a discussion thereof could not subserve any useful purpose, and might have a prejudicial effect upon the rights of one or the other of the parties, when the case is heard upon the merits.

Appeal dismissed

Mr. Justice Watts concurs. Mr. Justice Fraser did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nienow v. Nienow
141 S.E.2d 648 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 S.E. 754, 112 S.C. 126, 1919 S.C. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shearer-v-shearer-sc-1919.