Shearer, D. and J. v. Hafer, S.
This text of Shearer, D. and J. v. Hafer, S. (Shearer, D. and J. v. Hafer, S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
DIANA SHEARER AND JEFF SHEARER, : No. 248 MAL 2016 : Petitioners : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : SCOTT HAFER AND PAULETTE FORD, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of
Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:
a. Whether the Superior Court should be reversed because it erred in affirming the trial court’s order granting [Respondents’] request for a protective order where Mrs. Shearer has the right to have counsel present and to audio record all portions of a defense neuropsychological examination pursuant to the clear language of Pa.R.C.P. 4010[?]
b. Whether the Superior Court should be reversed because it erred in affirming the trial court’s order granting [Respondents’] request for a protective order where Mrs. Shearer has the right to have counsel present and to audio record all portions of a defense neuropsychological examination and where [Respondents] have not shown good cause to justify stripping Mrs. Shearer of these protections granted to her under Pa.R.C.P. 4010[?]
In addition to the issues framed by Petitioners, the parties are directed to address
the following question: Whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the appeal was properly before it under
the collateral order doctrine of Pa.R.A.P. 313?
[248 MAL 2016] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shearer, D. and J. v. Hafer, S., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shearer-d-and-j-v-hafer-s-pa-2016.