Sheard v. Department of Social Welfare

310 F. Supp. 544, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13543
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa
DecidedMay 13, 1969
DocketCiv. No. 67-C-521-EC
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 310 F. Supp. 544 (Sheard v. Department of Social Welfare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sheard v. Department of Social Welfare, 310 F. Supp. 544, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13543 (N.D. Iowa 1969).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and ORDER

McMANUS, District Judge.

In this action before a three-judge court, plaintiff individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated seeks to have declared unconstitutional the Iowa residency-domicile requirement for Old-Age Assistance, § 249.6(4) Code of Iowa 1966, and to have defendants enjoined from enforcing this provision. In addition, plaintiff in her amended complaint seeks to receive from the Iowa Department of Social Welfare monetary damages equal to the amount of money plaintiff would have been entitled to receive but for the residency-domicile requirement. This action is brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343 and plaintiff is a representative of a properly constituted class, F.R.C.P. 23.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Since May 1, 1966 plaintiff Mary L. Sheard has resided in the State of Iowa.

2. Prior to May 1, 1967 she received Old-Age Assistance from the State of Mississippi which was terminated on said date.

3. As of July 10, 1967 and at all times material thereafter she met all eligibility requirements for Old-Age Assistance under § 249.6 Code of Iowa 1966 except subsections (4) 1, (7) and (8) thereof.

ISSUE

Does § 249.6(4) Code of Iowa 1966 violate the Constitution of the United States ?

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Section 249.6(4) Code of Iowa 1966 violates the equal protection clause, § 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the constitutional right to travel from one state .to another. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (April 21, 1969.)

It is therefore

Ordered, adjudged and decreed

1. Section 249.6(4) Code of Iowa 1966 denies to plaintiff Mary L. Sheard and others similarly situated the equal protection of .the laws and the right to travel from one state to another as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and is invalid.

2. The defendant Iowa Department of Social Welfare, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently restrained from enforcing and executing § 249.6(4) of the Code of Iowa 1966 and from refusing to grant Old-Age Assistance to the plaintiff Mary L. Sheard and others similarly situated because of said provision.

[546]*5463. Jurisdiction of this cause is retained on condition that the Iowa Department of Social Welfare promptly process plaintiff Mary L. Sheard’s pending application for Old-Age Assistance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jeffrey v. Colorado State Department of Social Services
599 P.2d 874 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1979)
Cahill v. Cedar County, Iowa
367 F. Supp. 39 (N.D. Iowa, 1973)
Rivera v. Dunn
329 F. Supp. 554 (D. Connecticut, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
310 F. Supp. 544, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheard-v-department-of-social-welfare-iand-1969.