Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 16, 2018·No. 01-18-00420-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued October 16, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00420-CV ——————————— SHEANA ELIZABETH BELL, Appellants V. CASEY LYNN MORRISON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-48727

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Sheana Elizabeth Bell, has neither established indigence for

purposes of appellate costs, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for

preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),

43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison (Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.