Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison

Opinion

Opinion issued October 16, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately

respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),

43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-18-00420-CV ——————————— SHEANA ELIZABETH BELL, Appellants V. CASEY LYNN MORRISON, Appellee On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-48727 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Sheana Elizabeth Bell, has neither established indigence for purposes of appellate costs, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a). After