Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison
Opinion
Opinion issued October 16, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00420-CV ——————————— SHEANA ELIZABETH BELL, Appellants V. CASEY LYNN MORRISON, Appellee
On Appeal from the 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2010-48727
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Sheana Elizabeth Bell, has neither established indigence for
purposes of appellate costs, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for
preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately
respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),
43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison (Sheana Elizabeth Bell v. Casey Lynn Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.