Shean v. Gist

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Shean v. Gist

2 Ky. Op. 542, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 489

DecidedOctober 15, 1868

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ky. Op. 542 (Shean v. Gist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shean v. Gist, 2 Ky. Op. 542, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 489 (Ky. Ct. App. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion oe ti-ie Court by

Judge Robertson :

The failure to answer the petition in proper time authorized the judgment as rendered. There was no available error in refusing the answer when offered. It did not show the ground of the suit to which it referred, nor did it present on its own face any good ground for changing or suspending the judgment which the petition of the appellees was seeking to enforce.

We see no error in the judgment appealed from. It is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion oe ti-ie Court by

Judge Robertson :

The failure to answer the petition in proper time authorized the judgment as rendered. There was no available error in refusing the answer when offered. It did not show the ground of the suit to which it referred, nor did it present on its own face any good ground for changing or suspending the judgment which the petition of the appellees was seeking to enforce.

We see no error in the judgment appealed from. It is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ky. Op. 542, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shean-v-gist-kyctapp-1868.