Shean Satgunam Md v. Hackney Grover Hoover & Bean
This text of Shean Satgunam Md v. Hackney Grover Hoover & Bean (Shean Satgunam Md v. Hackney Grover Hoover & Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
April 10, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
151274 & (18) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano SHEAN SATGUNAM, M.D., Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 151274 COA: 323798 Ingham CC: 12-001194-NM HACKNEY, GROVER, HOOVER & BEAN, Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 10, 2015 p0407 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shean Satgunam Md v. Hackney Grover Hoover & Bean, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shean-satgunam-md-v-hackney-grover-hoover-bean-mich-2015.